Page 7 of 12

PGT: We were supposed to have followed a "mixed economic model". We were supposed to take the best of capitalism and the best of socialism or communism, but somehow, people say that we ended up with a mixed-up economy. What are your views...? I mean, did we get the worst of both worlds?

AKS: Perhaps to some extent we probably did, and if you look at the communist countries, they had a lot of inefficiencies, and over-control of development and lack of economic enterprise, but typically they achieved a great deal of expansion in education and health care, and quite dramatically, and that might be a characteristic feature, that unites Russia and China and Vietnam and Cuba. India did not go in that direction, didn't achieve that. So the governmental control was more of a negative kind, rather than being a positive thing. On the other hand, the capitalist economies made very good use of personal incentives, and the desire of human beings to better their own lives, in the process bettering the lives of others, and seeing the economic opportunities and being dynamic - in a world economy. And we didn't do that either - we sat on those opportunities. So I think, if you feel that we may have got the worst of both worlds, you may not be mistaken, you may be justified...